Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Order "The Wealth of the World and the Poverty of Nations" from the MIT Press.

Globalist Bookshelf > Income Inequality
The World's Income Odyssey
 

By Daniel Cohen | Friday, May 25, 2001
 

A simple inventory of the world's present inequalities shows strikingly how much more must be done to eliminate differences in wealth. Daniel Cohen explains just how impressed — or unimpressed — we should be about this dilemma in this excerpt from his book, "The Wealth of the World and the Poverty of Nations" on our Globalist Bookshelf.


Western traveler visiting the metropolises of developing countries is immediately struck by persistent contrasts. Tourists visiting Egypt may be just as impressed by the overpopulated and unkempt alleys at the base of the Sphinx as they are by the pyramids. Our images of Egypt are at once real and deceptive.

If Egypt could grow at the traditional growth rate forecast for Asia (7.5% per year), it would take less than 15 years to eliminate half of the present gap in the standard of living between it and Europe. As a result, around 2025 Egypt would have made up three-fourths of the gap. Obviously, a similar narrowing of the gap cannot reasonably be expected by any poor individual living in a rich country, or for his children or even his grandchildren.

Comparing rich and poor

According to our new method of calculation, rich countries and poor countries each earn approximately half of the total wealth.

For a long time, the comparisons of income levels between rich and poor countries have underestimated, sometimes to a considerable extent, the income of poor countries. For example, the task of a hairdresser working in a developing country is fundamentally no different from that of a hairdresser in a rich country.

For a given task, an Egyptian barber will make considerably less money than a Parisian barber — even if they both do the same work — simply because his clients are poor, and his own professional alternatives are not as promising.

The reality of purchasing power

But let us now reverse the argument: If a haircut costs one-thirtieth as much in Cairo as it does in Paris, it follows that in reality the purchasing power of someone living in Cairo is far greater than it seems. He earns less (in dollars), but a substantial number of local goods (haircuts, various other services, rent and so on) are less expensive.

To establish a reasonable comparison between the income of poor countries and that of rich countries, we must therefore reevaluate — sometimes to a considerable extent — all activities that are not tied to world trade. When calculating the income of poor countries, we now must include the additional amount corresponding to the cheaper local goods.

Wealth in the world

After such reevaluation, we are left with a radically different picture of wealth in the world. According to traditional methods of calculation, rich countries — which account for a little less than 20% of the world's population — earn close to 80% of the world's wealth.

Rich countries and poor countries each earn approximately half of the total wealth.

However, according to our new method of calculation, rich countries and poor countries each earn approximately half of the total wealth. It is a coincidence that this partition is not very different from what can be observed within rich countries themselves. For example, in the United States and in Europe, the wealthiest 20% of individuals generally earn between 40 and 50% of the aggregate wealth.

A convergence of incomes?

Consequently, as in the poor countries, the remaining 80% must be satisfied with the other half of the wealth. Given these figures, we can predict that inequalities in income levels within countries are most likely more acute than inequalities in the world at large. What we might call "the great hope of the 21st century," namely a convergence of incomes throughout the world, is already underway.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036