Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Order "The Wealth of the World and the Poverty of Nations" from the MIT Press.

Globalist Bookshelf > Global History
Singapore and Hong Kong — Asia Rising
 

By Daniel Cohen | Saturday, August 11, 2001
 

Immediately after World War II, two big shantytowns were used by the British as warehouses for their trade with Asia — Singapore and Hong Kong. Incredibly, each has now become wealthier than its former colonial master. Daniel Cohen plots out the history that rocketed the two nations towards prosperity in this excerpt from "The Wealth of the World and the Poverty of Nations."


ingapore is now one of the ten wealthiest countries in the world, on a par with Canada. Hong Kong comes close, at the same level as Italy.

Refugee influx

But during the early postwar years, Hong Kong fared better than Singapore.

Singapore has development from a place with very little financial activity into one of the most active financial centers in Asia.

Shortly after the Chinese Revolution of 1949, hundreds of thousands of refugees flowed into the city — among them a large number of former entrepreneurs from Shanghai.

These immigrants brought with them a great deal of industrial know-how. They promptly reconstructed an industrial base that put Hong Kong on a solid growth trajectory.

Industrial growth

At first, the industrialization of Hong Kong was based on textiles.

Then, as industrialized countries reinforced their protectionism, the city moved into more elaborate production, expanding into the clothing industry, in which it is more difficult for protectionism to set efficient norms.

Setting a course for liberalization

Throughout the 1970s, Hong Kong gradually extended its range of activities, soon becoming the world's leading manufacturer of toys and one of the leading exporters of electronic products and quartz watches in particular.

The year 1967 was a turning point for Singapore: The iron-fisted Lee Kuan Yew took charge of the city.

In the early 1980s, at the peak of Hong Kong's industrialization, China embarked on a course of economic liberalization. In a twist of fate, people returned to Shanghai from Hong Kong to recreate capitalism as they had once known it in pre-Mao China.

Hong Kong slowly began to revert to its former role as a warehouse for trade between China and the rest of the world.

Postwar challenges

Singapore's postwar experience was far more difficult. The educational attainment of the population was one of the lowest in the world, and the political climate was very unstable. The city was shaken by a communist insurrection in Malaysia in the 1950s, then by a war between Indonesia and Malaysia in the 1960s.

In 1967, when Great Britain decided to withdraw its military personnel from the city, industrialization had not yet taken off.

Life under the iron fist

The year 1967 was a turning point for Singapore: the iron-fisted Lee Kuan Yew took charge of the city.

Singapore is now one of the ten wealthiest countries in the world, on par with Canada.

The Singaporean government promulgated a series of quasi-dictatorial reforms.

Labor legislation was "simplified" in such a way that all labor disputes were submitted to the judgment of an industrial court of arbitration whose mission was to watch over the "interests of the community as a whole."

The pension solution

The government also launched a radical reform regarding public funds. In the early 1970s, the government was able to avail itself of a surplus of public funds in excess of 10% of the gross domestic product.

The mandatory pension funds plan that was later established financed, by itself, half of the investment in the city throughout the 1970s and the 1980s.

Going international

Finally, the government offered foreign investors tax exemptions of up to 90% on profits generated. As a result, Singapore became the leading recipient of international investments in the world.

The rate at which Singapore's government pushes its industries forward is spectacular and — according to many observers — absurd.

Singapore's government increased industrial subsidies, taking advantage of its considerable internal and external resources.

After first focusing on textiles, it turned to chemicals and oil, then to toys, then to electronics and computers — and finally (in the early 1990s) to financial services.

Lacking experience

In the early 1980s, Singapore had absolutely no computer experience. By the late 1980s, it had become the leading exporter of hard disks in the world.

Equally impressive is Singapore's development from a place with very little financial activity into one of the most active financial centers in Asia.

Enabling success

The rate at which Singapore's government pushes its industries forward is spectacular and — according to many observers — absurd.

In the early 1980s, Singapore had absolutely no computer experience. By the late 1980s, it had become the leading exporter of hard disks in the world.

None of the industries has enough time to consolidate its advantages before the government, in a mad race, is already moving on to the next stage of specialization.

And yet, this strategy can be said to have worked. The fast pace of decisions regarding specialization, while unrealistic at every stage, has enabled Singapore to become one of the wealthiest cities in the world. A number of countries, in Asia and elsewhere, are using Singapore and Hong Kong as points of reference.


Adapted from "The Wealth of the World and the Poverty of Nations" by Daniel Cohen. Copyright © 1998 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Used by permission of MIT Press.

Daniel Cohen is professor of economics at the University of Paris (Panthéon-Sorbonne).




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036