Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Order Michael Lind's "The Radical Center."

Globalist Bookshelf > Global History
The United States in 1800
 

By Michael Lind | Saturday, November 30, 2002
 

As the 21st century dawns, the United States is the driving force behind the modern age of technology and communication. Yet this high-tech country has quaint, agrarian roots. In the book, "The Radical Center", Ted Halstead and Michael Lind look at the early days of this young nation's history — and trace the country’s rapid race to modernity.


t has to be counted among the major ironies of history that the 13 colonies which became the United States seceded from the British empire at the very moment that Britain was becoming the laboratory of the industrial revolution.

A rural republic

Far from being one of the first societies of the dawning industrial era, however, the United States was one of the last countries to be born in the final years of agrarian civilization.

The United States of 1800 was closer to ancient Greece and Rome or medieval Europe than it was to the United States of 1850 — or 1900 or 1950.

A few visionaries — among them Alexander Hamilton, George Washington's Secretary of the Treasury — understood the importance of the new, steam-powered industrial economy arising in Britain. That's why he wanted the United States to become a great manufacturing power.

But the Hamiltonian vision of America's future was defeated by the rival vision of Thomas Jefferson and his allies. They hoped that the United States would remain a republic of farmers, which was a message that resonated with America's rural majority.

The medieval United States

The U.S. economy was almost wholly agrarian well into the 19th century. Back in 1790, only 5 percent of the 4 million inhabitants of the United States (including 757,000 nonwhites, most of them slaves) lived in urban areas with 2,500 or more residents.

When Alexis de Tocqueville visited the United States in 1831, 10 out of every 11 Americans lived on family farms. In its technology and economy, the United States of 1800 was closer to ancient Greece and Rome or medieval Europe than it was to the United States of 1850 — or 1900 or 1950.

The power of rivers

The major sources of energy at the time were still wind and water. Mills still had to be located on streams. And just as in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, canals were the major infrastructure projects.

Far from being one of the first societies of the industrial era, the United States was one of the last agrarian countries.

Before 1840, inland waterways like the Erie Canal were much more important than railroads in providing transportation.

Steamboats made it possible to extend commerce up previously unnavigable rivers. Between 1817 and 1840, the number of steamboats in the trans-Appalachian West grew from 17 to 536.

Nonetheless, travel remained so difficult that Jefferson believed it would take centuries to settle the territory of the Louisiana Purchase — and speculated that Anglo-American settlers on the remote Pacific coast would form new countries.

Early markets

The market in the first American republic was rudimentary and weak. Joint-stock corporations usually had to be chartered for specific public purposes by state legislatures — a relic of the medieval idea of the corporation as a monopoly chartered by the king.

The formation of an integrated national market was retarded by the powerful tradition of states' rights and localism. Despite the political independence of the United States from Britain, the southern plantation economy in effect was part of the British economy.

State sovereignty

Cotton, which displaced wool as the chief raw material for the British textile industry by 1801, could only be grown in tropical climates like that found in the Caribbean and the American South.

In the early years, there was no uniform standard of U.S. citizenship, which meant that one had to be a citizen of a state to be a citizen of the republic.

The South became Britain's principal supplier, and before the Civil War the South got most of its capital from Britain.

In those years, the government sector was as undeveloped as the business sector. Indeed, in most respects the state governments were more important than the federal government.

The main source of federal revenue was the tariff, a tax on imported goods. And the largest federal government agency was the post office, which provided presidents with a source of patronage appointments.

Powerless feds

The federal presence in the economy was minor. The states — rather than the federal government — paid for most infrastructure projects like canals and early railroads.

The United States greatly expanded its continental territory during this period — usually by means that did not require a powerful federal army.

Manifest destiny

For example, in 1804, Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory from Napoleon, and so-called filibusters — American settlers covertly encouraged by U.S. leaders — detached Florida and then Texas from Spanish and Mexican rule.

Ironically, the 13 colonies which became the United States seceded from the British empire before Britain became the laboratory of the industrial revolution.

There was a small, highly competent U.S. military, but Jefferson and his successors rejected Hamilton's plan for a federal military academy. West Point was a scaled-down institution that focused on civil engineering.

The American military effort in the Mexican War of 1846-48 was handicapped by reliance on the militias, whose members tended to be disorderly and insubordinate.

Liberty for all?

There was no uniform standard of U.S. citizenship, which meant that one had to be a citizen of a specific state to be a citizen of the republic.

This enabled the southern states to exclude black slaves from citizenship. Among the white population, citizenship and voting rights were gradually extended by the individual states.

Racism

By the 1840s, most states had abolished property qualifications for voting and religious tests for holding public office. But suffrage was still limited to adult white men.

There was no standard of U.S. citizenship. One had to be a citizen of a state to be a citizen of the republic.

Racist immigration laws, meanwhile, limited legal immigration and naturalization to "free white persons."

The informal conception of American identity in this era held that the United States was an Anglo-American Protestant nation.

America's early years

The first American republic, then, was a largely agrarian society. Extensive development — in the form of expansion of the plantation and family farm economy to the South and West — took the place of intensive development in the form of industrialization.

Nevertheless, long-term technological, economic and demographic trends were working slowly to undermine those agrarian concepts.

Regional industrialization and large-scale European immigration shifted the balance of power in America away from the conservative, agrarian South — and toward the modernizing North.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036