Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Will Iraq be resilient to Western occupation?

Globalist Perspective > Global Security
Iraq: Will It Be Different This Time?
 

By James P. Pinkerton | Friday, December 20, 2002
 

One can speculate endlessly as to whether Saddam Hussein is as dangerous as Adolf Hitler. Others wonder whether the Iraqis will fight as tenaciously as the Viet Cong. But one simple insight stands out: Iraq may or may not be like Nazi Germany, or communist North Vietnam. But Iraq is definitely like Iraq. And that alone should provide a dose of humility for would-be liberators. James Pinkerton explains.


n the last century, it was Great Britain which invaded Iraq twice — in World War I and World War II. Both times, the British were successful — although the Mesopotamian campaigns of 1915-1917 cost them over 50,000 lives.

Blame the Brits?

Of course, in light of recent events, it’s hard to see what good they accomplished back then. Indeed, some observers note the artificial borders of Iraq — and conclude that many of the problems that the English-speakers are poised to “fix” today are the result of those past British adventures.

One is hard-pressed to find any place in the Arab — or even the Muslim — world where a non-Muslim minority successfully rules over a Muslim majority.

These problems range from the border dispute with Kuwait to the dispossession of the Kurds.

But now it appears all but certain that America will retrace that forlorn path. In doing so, it appears to ignore tragic monuments to past folly. “It’ll be different this time” — that’s the standard refrain of the giddy, the optimistic and the ahistorical.

But the mechanics of U.S. occupation should give anybody pause. For a primer on the benefits and odds of occupation, just ask yourself these questions: How are the mighty Israelis doing in the West Bank — after decades of occupation? How are the powerful Indians doing in Kashmir?

Majority rule?

Indeed, one is hard-pressed to find any place in the Arab — or even the Muslim — world where a non-Muslim minority successfully rules over a Muslim majority. That is, Muslims seem to be inspired by the anti-colonial Zeitgeist — plus, of course, their own fierce faith.

And it’s that faith that Americans and Westerners in general have underestimated. Little has happened in the Muslim world over the last three decades that actually was anticipated by non-Muslim observers.

Predicting the Muslim world

Let’s examine that list of surprises. It ranges from the surprising effectiveness of the Egyptian army in the early days of the Yom Kippur War in 1973 to the fall of the Shah in 1979.

It’s hard to imagine America suffering a Waterloo-like fate anytime soon. Which is not the same as it not happening, ever.

And it goes on to the stalemate of the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s, the rise of Hezbollah-style suicide bombing in the 1990s — and finally the strategy of airplane bombing of today.

And yet, most of these events can be traced back to Islamic militancy. Now that militancy is spreading to other Muslim countries, such as Indonesia — a place that few Americans even knew was Islamic.

A militant surprise

Indeed, until a few years ago, most Indonesians didn’t seem to know they were Muslim. Western ways predominated. But now, the country is fundamentalizing, radicalizing — and anti-Americanizing.

What’s the reason for Indonesia’s change? And Islam’s? Is it a spontaneous upheaval? Is it in reaction to America? To Israel? To Britney Spears?

An American Waterloo?

As the struggle of ideas across oceans and continents is subject to a constant flux that is full of surprises, so is the world of military affairs. It’s hard to imagine America suffering a Waterloo-like fate anytime soon. Which, of course, is not the same as it not happening, ever.

Little has happened in the Muslim world over the last three decades that actually was anticipated by non-Muslim observers.

After all, in 1815, neither Wellington the winner nor Napoleon the loser had to concern themselves with weapons of mass destruction. History may be cyclical, but technology is mostly linear.

And so sometimes, the line may trump the circle. And if and when that happens, even the mightiest empire could fall.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036