Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Order "The Shield of Achilles"

Globalist Bookshelf > Global Society
Fast Forward to 2025 and Beyond
 

By Philip Bobbitt | Thursday, February 26, 2004
 

What will the world look like two decades from now? Who will be up — and who will be down? Which new leaders will advance social and political reforms in 2025? Writing from the perspective of the future in his book “The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History,” Philip Bobbitt explores some of these issues — and ponders new ones — that will affect the world during this era.


y 2025, the world’s population had increased to a level of about 7.5 billion people. The most dramatic demographic event in the first quarter century, however, was a precipitous drop in population growth.

Significant changes

This drop did not occur uniformly. The states of the developed world lost population share, declining from 21% to 12%.

The universal communications made possible by the ubiquitous — and cheap — handheld wireless computer-telephone-television tied the world’s cultures together as never before.

This decline was especially significant because since the year 1650, that share had hovered between 34% and 26%.

Meanwhile, a number of less developed states not only managed to stabilize their populations — including China, Taiwan, Korea and Algeria — but their birthrates declined as well.

Other states — such as India, Pakistan, Mexico and Brazil — continued to grow, but then leveled off in the 2030s and 2040s. Some states — notably Nigeria, Zaire, Ethiopia and Rwanda — experienced a largely unchanged, high fertility rate.

Stagnant economy

Yet, these nations’ population levels still suffered, owing to various catastrophic events. The world in 2025 saw a falling population for the first time in four centuries.

This had direct consequences on economic growth. In the developed states of the northern-tier, the demand for consumer goods was faltering as the population aged.

Organ farms

In the less developed southern-tier states, increasing population pressures drove up the price of foodstuffs.

The world in 2025 saw a falling population for the first time in four centuries — this had direct consequences on economic growth.

Nevertheless, both regions — with the exception of some African states — were linked by commerce. There were some unattractive aspects to this flourishing trade.

For example, organ farms (really “hospitals” that removed organs from paid donors) arose in Pakistan, the Philippines and various other states to supply first-world demand for transplants, though these were ultimately replaced by transgenic methods that used animals.

Prisoner mine workers

Some states acquired needed capital by locating nuclear waste sites on their national territory — and by permitting mineral-extraction methods outlawed elsewhere.

For a time in the 2020s, Russia was taken over by a raw-materials development company that employed political prisoners as workers in mines. It also wholly corrupted the Duma — by giving members “derivative” sub-soil rights to the petroleum and minerals beneath Siberia.

Nation buying

In Russia at this time, a new form of civil right was introduced. It permitted any citizen or registered company to buy shares in the state, thus giving weighted voting according to the number of shares purchased.

The reach of a single language — English — embraced 60% of the world’s inhabitants by 2040.

As unsavory as this may sound, it did have the result of efficiently extracting Russia’s abundant raw materials, which had hitherto frustrated most attempts at development.

Moreover, the privatization of the state brought sufficient capital to the country through foreign investment. As a result, perennial Russian agricultural shortfalls were finally halted through a program of genetically engineered hybridization.

Free-trade market

Pakistan and India joined in a free trade area in 2010, providing the crucial momentum that made India the world’s largest single market by 2025.

Other intermediary states flourished in the new environment of general free trade: Witness Turkey, Indonesia, South Africa, Mexico, Iran and Algeria.

Global jobs’ programs

A global hiring program operated on the Internet allowed anyone anywhere to access job opportunities worldwide.

By 2040, the number of nominal citizens — and resident citizens combined — of the top fifteen formerly third world countries surpassed year 2000 levels of GDP per capita for first world countries.

As part of a universal reciprocity regime for jobs, that person also received a one-year “green card” — once employment was assured.

By 2040, the number of nominal citizens and resident citizens combined of the top 15 formerly third world countries surpassed year 2000 levels of GDP per capita for first world countries.

Successful economic reforms in these states — especially the free trade areas of India-Pakistan, China-Taiwan, Korea-Japan and Singapore-Malaysia-Indonesia-Thailand — prompted the election of ever more politicians committed to economic reform.

Shift in perspective

Increases in successful free-market reform yielded increases in individual freedom.

By contrast, per-capita consumption in the first world shifted as more emphasis was placed on quality investments such as child safety, preventive medical care and lifelong education.

Monitoring violence

Environmental quality was monitored and protected by licensed entrepreneurs who held various resources (for example, air quality) in trust for the state.

Russia’s privatization brought sufficient capital to the country — that perennial agricultural shortfalls were finally halted through a program of genetically engineered hybridization.

The 2020s also saw a number of innovations in civil society: Violence-prone adolescents — identified by genetic screening at birth — were monitored when convicted of violent crimes and their activities circumscribed through various electronic means.

The most serious offenders were exiled to other countries in exchange for cash payments — and there, typically turned to agricultural or military duties.

In some countries, medical and education vouchers were earned through the avoidance of legal “demerits.” Citizens with a record of infractions were barred from schooling beyond high school.

Demerit method

They were also denied all but some inexpensive forms of acute care, unless they were able to secure their own funds.

This rather draconian system was to some extent mitigated by a system of behavior bribes whereby nonviolent offenders were paroled to specialized private corporations.

Drug holidays

There, they were maintained as wards of the market, in comfortable circumstances performing menial tasks, so long as they refrained from further offenses.

Per-capita consumption in the first world shifted as more emphasis was placed on quality investments such as child safety, preventive medical care —and lifelong education.

Drug offenders were either exported to states that had legalized drug use — or confined to privately run “Virtual Holiday” camps, where non-lethal drug use was permitted.

By these various means, prison populations were dramatically reduced.

The universal communications made possible by the ubiquitous (and cheap) handheld wireless computer/telephone/television tied the world’s cultures together as never before.

The reach of a single language — English — embraced 60% of the world’s inhabitants by 2040.

Adapted from “The Shield of Achilles” by Philip Bobbitt. Copyright © 2003 by Philip Bobbitt. Used by permission of Philip Bobbitt.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036