Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 


Globalist Perspective > Global Diplomacy
U.S. Foreign Policy and the Solar System
 

By Bruce W. Jentleson | Thursday, November 08, 2007
 

For all the debate about the present and future of U.S. foreign policy, few people realize that — at the core of it all — is a very basic yet fundamental dispute of galactic proportions. As Duke University's Bruce Jentleson explains, it pits the ancient Greek philosopher Ptolemy, for whom the Earth was at the center of the universe, against Copernicus, who discovered that everything revolved around the sun.


uring the Cold War, the U.S. position in the world was a lot like the ancient Greek philosopher Ptolemy's theory of the universe. For Ptolemy, as you may remember, the Earth was at the center, with all the other planets — indeed the whole solar system — revolving around it.

And so, too, was the United States. We Americans, rightly or wrongly, saw ourselves as the pivot point of the entire Cold War universe. We were the wielder of power. And the economic engine. And the bastion of free-world ideology.

After the deluge

Indeed, when the Cold War ended with
For Ptolemy, as you may remember, the Earth was at the center, with all the other planets — indeed the whole solar system — revolving around it.
the demise and defeat of the Soviet Union, the centrality of the United States seemed to become even more definitive.

We were wrapped in the mantle of being the sole surviving superpower. The U.S. economy was driving globalization, plain and simple. Democracy, which we portrayed ceaselessly as our real gift to humankind, was spreading all over. In short, the world seemed more Ptolemaic than ever before.

Not anymore. While still the single most powerful country, global geopolitics are not revolving around the United States nearly as much.

Waiting for the sun

The global economy has become much more competitive, and the U.S. economic position much weakened. While we like to still think of ourselves as the beacon of shared values to which others turn, the source of political wisdom to which they look up, and the rightful world leader, so much of the world is not seeing us this way.

It's now a Copernican world in which the Earth — aka the United States — is not at the center. And it's harder to analogize to what the "sun" is, but the crucial point is that we are not at the center. While our gravitational pull is still strong, it is not so strong that others orbit around us.

Made in the USA

As bad as the Bush Administration's foreign policy has been, and as much as it has pushed others away from us, the forces shaping this system run much deeper. Other powers have been rising (China), recovering (Russia)
While the United States likes to still think of itself as the beacon of shared values to which others turn, the source of political wisdom to which they look up, and the rightful world leader, so much of the world is not seeing it this way.
and seeking to invigorate (European Union).

Regionalism is strengthening and deepening politically as well as economically. Many of the 190-plus nations in the world finally emerging on the global stage after long histories of colonialism and superpower dominance are more assertive of their own interests and identities. There are a lot of players, a lot of orbits.

With globalization, the overriding trend has been toward "less of a 'Made in the USA' character," as the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) put it in its "Mapping 2020" project report. The report, issued almost three years ago, was about realistically competing in this global future, not unrealistically colluding to undermine it. That's to its credit. It's also the key reason why little came of it in an administration that still is more Ptolemaic than Copernican.

Nor is America dominant in the "war of ideas," as fewer peoples are as inclined to "be like us." And that disassociation happens not just within the Arab-Islamic world.

Where to live the good life

Pick your measure: The consistently low numbers in global public opinion polls for views of the United States and especially American foreign policy. Anti-American demonstrations, violent and non-violent, in country after country.

Even the image of the United States itself is not what we would like to think it is. "Suppose a young person who wanted to leave this country asked you to recommend where to go to lead a good life," asked a 2005 Pew survey in 16 different countries. "What country would you recommend?" Only in one country was the United States the first choice.

This is not about declinism. It is about the fallacy of assuming centrality. And the need to understand the nature of our era as a global one.

Challenging holy scripture

This problem does not just apply to Republicans. It goes for those Democrats, too, whose liberal internationalism still has alliances and institutions largely revolving around the United States — in ways that still tend to be too Ptolemaic.

It's now a Copernican world in which the Earth — aka the United States — is not at the center.

Some of this reflects the conventional wisdom that talking about the United States as anything other than the global leader is political heresy amidst a public that is looking for greatness restored.

We'd do well to heed Copernicus, who when accused of the much greater heresy of challenging the Catholic Church and Holy Scripture, beseeched people to "face the facts, as they say, with both eyes open." For even more than this or that policy proposal for this or that particular issue, we need to grasp the fundamental changes in the nature of the world in which the United States seeks to play its role.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.

Bruce A. Roth, founder of Daisy Alliance , Atlanta, Georgia , United States
(Thursday, November 08, 2007, 10:05:57 AM ):

In 1633, the Inquisition sentenced Galileo to life imprisonment for teaching “Copernican heresy.” Not until October 1992, during the papacy of Pope John Paul II, did the Church officially abandon its position and apologize. Let’s hope that it will not take another 359 years for the “Neo-Ptolemeans” to do the same.

Let us know what you think ...
 

 

 

 

You must be a registered user of our site to send us your comments. If you have already registered, please log in. If you a new user of our site, please register now. Registration is quick, easy and completely free.

   

Complete the below to send a letter to the editor about this article.

   
Name  
 
Email Address  
 
City and State  
 
Country  
 
Comments  
 

 
Please note: If we publish your comment on The Globalist, we will identify only your name, city and country. We do not publish anonymous comments. Your email address will not be published.

We regret that we cannot publish every comment we receive. Furthermore, because we review each comment before it is published, there may be a delay between the time you send your comment and its appearance on our site. The Globalist reserves the right to edit comments for style and length.

-->




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036