Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive our weekly e-newsletter containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist, sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2009

Best Books of 2008


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?




 

Order "Dirt" here.

Globalist Bookshelf > Global Environment
Disappearing Farmland
 

By David R. Montgomery | Saturday, March 08, 2008
 

Growing urbanization in developing countries has substantially changed the economy and, in turn, people's occupations. Increasingly, farmers are employing their land for purposes other than agriculture. In this Globalist Bookshelf selection from "Dirt," David R. Montgomery examines the consequences of the loss of farmland around the world.


e can’t afford to lose any more farmland. Fifty years from now, every hectare of agricultural land will be crucial. Every farm that gets paved over today means that the world will support fewer people down the road.

In India, where we would expect farmland to be sacred, farmers near cities are selling off topsoil to make bricks for the booming housing market.

Diminishing resources

Developing nations simply cannot afford to sell off their future this way, just as the developed world cannot pave its way to sustainability. Agricultural land should be
Coupled with the inevitable end of fossil-fuel-derived fertilizers, the ongoing loss of cropland and soil poses the problem of feeding a growing population from a shrinking land base.
viewed — and treated — as a trust held by farmers today for farmers tomorrow.

Still, farms should be owned by those who work them — by people who know their land and who have a stake in improving it. Tenant farming is not in society’s best interest. Private ownership is essential — as absentee land lords give little thought to safeguarding the future.

As much as climate change, the demand for food will be a major driver of global environmental change throughout the coming decades. Over the past century, the effects of long-term soil erosion were masked by bringing new land under cultivation and developing fertilizers, pesticides and crop varieties that compensate for declining soil productivity.

The future of farming

However, the greatest benefits of such technological advances accrue in applications to deep, organic-rich topsoil. Agrotech fixes become progressively more difficult to maintain as soil thins, because crop yields decline exponentially with soil loss.

Coupled with the inevitable end of fossil-fuel-derived fertilizers, the ongoing loss of cropland and soil poses the problem of feeding a growing population from a shrinking land base.

Whereas the effects of soil erosion can be temporarily offset with fertilizers and in some cases irrigation, the long-term productivity of the land cannot be maintained in the face of reduced soil organic matter, depleted soil biota and thinning soil that so far have characterized industrial agriculture.

Living foundations

Many factors may contribute to ending a civilization, but an adequate supply of fertile soil is necessary to sustain one. Using up the soil and moving on to new
Agricultural land should be viewed — and treated — as a trust held by farmers today for farmers tomorrow.
land will not be a viable option for future generations.

Will modern soil conservation efforts prove too little, too late — like those of ancient societies? Or will we relearn how to preserve agricultural soils as we use them even more intensively? Extending the life span of our civilization will require reshaping agriculture to respect the soil not as an input to an industrial process, but as the living foundation for material wealth.

As odd as it may sound, civilization’s survival depends on treating soil as an investment, as a valuable inheritance rather than a commodity — as something other than dirt.

Editor's Note: This excerpt is adapted from DIRT: THE EROSION OF CIVILIZATIONS by David R. Montgomery. Copyright 2007 University of California Press. Reprinted with the permission of the publisher.

This is the second excerpt of a two-part series. Read Part I here.


Let us know what you think ...
 

 

 

 

You must be a registered user of our site to send us your comments. If you have already registered, please log in. If you a new user of our site, please register now. Registration is quick, easy and completely free.

   

Complete the below to send a letter to the editor about this article.

   
Name  
 
Email Address  
 
City and State  
 
Country  
 
Comments  
 

 
Please note: If we publish your comment on The Globalist, we will identify only your name, city and country. We do not publish anonymous comments. Your email address will not be published.

We regret that we cannot publish every comment we receive. Furthermore, because we review each comment before it is published, there may be a delay between the time you send your comment and its appearance on our site. The Globalist reserves the right to edit comments for style and length.

Copyright © 2000-2010 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

McPherson Square, 927 15th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005
The Globalist