Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 


Globalist Perspective > Global Trade
"Containing" Global Trade
 

By Edward Gresser | Monday, July 28, 2008
 

Rising energy prices are causing much concern around the world. As it becomes more expensive to fill up car tanks, it also becomes pricier to transport goods. As Edward Gresser discusses, although transporting goods is easier than ever, the cost of manufacturing trade has begun rising again — and may stay high for awhile.


uccessful merchants, wrote the 14th-century Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, come in two varieties. One buys goods of "medium" quality, suitable for sale to middle-class families as well as rulers and aristocrats.

The other imports things from far away — he meant Sahelian Africa, Persia, India and possibly China — which by nature are "few and rare," dangerous to transport along routes patrolled by pirates and bandits, and so command high prices.

Safer routes

Six centuries later, the concept of "far away" seems all but dead for commercial purposes. The extirpation of pirates and bandits in most parts of the world has taken away risk, fiber-optic cables and satellites allow long-distance services trade to be
By weight, U.S. imports clocked in at about 1.3 billion tons.
conducted at virtually no cost and container shipping radically reduced the time and cost of manufacturing trade.

The two sorts of successful merchants accordingly merged in the modern retailing chain, ferrying middle-class goods all over the world each day.

The dollar value of this trade, to the United States, is enormous. The United States recorded $1.94 trillion worth of goods imports last year.

Methods of transport

Of this total, $415 billion arrived by air, $1.02 trillion traveled by sea and $347 billion (from Mexico and Canada) was split among rail, truck and oil pipeline. America’s own $1.16 trillion in goods exports, meanwhile, are more evenly divided: $375 billion by ship, $365 billion by air and $422 billion by truck and rail.

By weight, U.S. imports clocked in at about 1.3 billion tons. Seaborne goods accounted for 950 million tons, truck, rail, and pipeline imports 240 million tons and air freight a tiny but expensive 4.5 million tons.

Better networks

Exports are generally lighter, weighing in at only 426 million tons by sea and 3.3 million tons by air. (I was not able to find the
The concept of "far away" seems all but dead for commercial purposes.
weight of American rail and truck exports in U.S. Department of Transportation data.)

These numbers clearly suggest that many of the dangers Ibn Khaldun spoke of have been overcome.

But could “distance” return? Probably not. Apart from anomalous cases like Somalia, piracy and banditry are unlikely to make a comeback. The telecom network will presumably only get better.

Trade costs

But the cost of manufacturing trade has begun rising again and may stay high for awhile as energy prices push up the cost of shipping and air freight.

A brief look at the fall and rise of shipping costs:

A brief history

Between 1997 and 2006, the world container-ship fleet grew from 1,954 ships to 3,907. The average capacity of a container ship rose as well, from 1,530 TEUs — "twenty-foot
The dollar value of this trade, to the United States, is enormous. The United States recorded $1.94 trillion worth of goods imports in 2007.
container equivalents" — to 2,500.

Freight costs accordingly fell. UNCTAD's annual Review of Maritime Transport report, using data from industry magazine Containerisation International, averages the cost of sending a container from Asia to the West Coast, East Coast and Gulf Coast.

Its figures, though varying a bit depending on demand and the use of the different routes, show the average cost of sending a container from Asia to the United States was over $2,000 at the turn of the century and dropped to levels usually between $1,500 and $1,800 between 2002 and 2007.

High energy costs

But with higher energy costs, shipping rates are rising. Containerisation International found the Asia-U.S. rates running above $1,725 at the beginning of 2008. More recent fees, though no systematic figure is yet available, are reported above $2,000.

Nor is Asia alone: The bill for shipping a 40-foot container from Paraguay to the United States was $3,100 in January and is now $4,300. The likely consequences, assuming energy prices remain high:

Consequences

  • Shift in American imports, especially
    The average cost of sending a container from Asia to the United States was over $2,000 at the turn of the century and dropped to levels usually between $1,500 and $1,800 between 2002 and 2007.
    heavy goods like metals and cheap goods like clothes, from Asia to Europe

  • Pressure on Chinese and other Asian exporters to move faster into high-priced, lighter, higher-technology products where transport costs are less important

  • More sparing use of air-freight, where fuel prices have risen even faster than for shipping

  • Mixed results for American exporters, with less pressure on the United States' $375 billion in seaborne goods — U.S. exports are more often light and expensive than heavy and cheap — but more on the $360 billion in air-freight exports.

    Khaldun's categories

    In effect, theory calls for a modest revival of Ibn Khaldun's separate categories of merchants selling medium-quality goods from local sources and more expensive goods from far away. Early indicators of this remain hard to pick out in reality, though.

    Seaborne imports have slimmed down a bit, from one billion tons in 2006 — the all-time record — to 950 million tons in 2007, and perhaps 900 million tons this year. Chinese imports have also slowed to a crawl this year. But both could reflect lower dollar values and the import-cutting effects of recession as much as energy costs.




  • Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

    Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




    Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

    1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036