Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 


Globalist Analysis > Global Culture
Three Decades of Change in China
 

By Richard Fisher | Wednesday, August 27, 2008
 

The pageantry of the Beijing Olympics recalled memories of another historic turning point in China for Richard W. Fisher — the economic liberalization that began in the late 1970s. He explains why foreigners must break through China's carefully crafted façade in order to have a truthful basis upon which to build economic and political ties.


y Australian father and South African-born Norwegian mother sailed out of Shanghai on the S.S. President Wilson just as that port was being closed by Communist revolutionaries in 1948. In a story too long to tell, I was born the following March, the felicitous by-product of an otherwise fretful stay at the Peace Hotel on the Bund.

My embryonic experience allows me to lay claim to being a China watcher for nearly 60 years. But it was only in 1979, when I served in the Carter Administration as coordinator of policy planning and assistant to Treasury Secretary Michael Blumenthal, that I first saw China.

My early experience in China, coupled with my involvement 20 years later in negotiating
The People’s Daily displayed a photograph of Chairman Hua escorting our delegation. The shape of our eyes had been doctored by hand into Chinese-like features.
China’s accession to the World Trade Organization for President Clinton, forms the lens through which I now view China.

President Nixon and Henry Kissinger had famously normalized political relations with China in their meetings with Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai in 1972. It fell on President Carter to settle the counterclaims between the United States and China that stemmed from the Communist takeover in 1949.

Without settling those counterclaims, we could not normally trade with each other. So after months of rigorous preparation, Secretary Blumenthal and his team, including me as his faithful chef de cabinet, were dispatched from Andrews Air Force Base to Beijing on February 23, 1979, to settle the claims.

We met with Deng Xiaoping, then-Chairman Hua Guofeng — a hapless fellow traveler of Mao’s whom we met with only for the purposes of being photographed for the People’s Daily, but paid little attention to, given that we knew of Deng’s ascendancy — and Blumenthal’s official counterpart, Finance Minister Zhang Jin-fu.

We sealed the preliminary deal on March 1, 1979, after arduous negotiations with Deng and Zhang. That day, we officially raised the flag over the American Embassy in Beijing, establishing the fulsome presence of the United States in China.

The memories of this trip flooded back as I viewed the spectacle and pageantry of the opening ceremonies of the Beijing Olympics. When we landed in that city on Saturday night,
We must work to find the China that lies behind a carefully crafted façade.
February 24, 1979, we were whisked off to the official guesthouse in Red Flag limousines.

The roads into Beijing had no cars — not because the route had been cordoned off for our delegation, but because there simply weren’t any.

What traffic we did see included skinny horses, donkeys, camels, oxen, exhaust-spewing trucks and countless bicycles made in the Forever bicycle factory in Shanghai for the purpose of realizing Zhou’s “four modernizations.”

By 2006, just 27 years later, Beijing had some 2.4 million motor vehicles, a small fraction of China’s total of 37 million. When the Blumenthal delegation arrived in Beijing in 1979, the main customers for OPEC and other oil producers were the United States, Japan and Western Europe.

In today’s dollars, the price of oil was broaching $90 at that time, on its way the next year to $100-plus.

Now, oil producers have as customers an added 1.3 billion Chinese, many of whom not only drive cars but operate factories and require heat for their homes — as well as the populations of catch-up
We need to look past carefully crafted images and deepen our understanding of China's national interest.
players like India and the countries liberated from Soviet tyranny.

This puts the supply and demand for oil and diesel and gasoline into perspective. If China used the same amount per capita as parsimonious Japan, Chinese consumption would total more than 18 billion barrels a year, an amount that dwarfs our country’s 7.5 billion barrels.

Add that to new demand for oil stemming from India, the newest members of the European Union, an increasingly prosperous Brazil and so on. For those trying to discern the long-term future of oil prices, this is considerable food for thought.

Once we reached the initial agreement to settle our claims on China — at roughly 40 cents on the dollar — we flew to Shanghai on a Chinese military plane for a little R&R before returning to Beijing to tidy up some fine points.

The Chinese government had picked out the prettiest military women they could muster to serve us drinks and meals on the flight. On a whim, one of my colleagues took out a Polaroid camera and took a picture of these impromptu flight attendants.

You would have thought he had struck a match in some far corner of the world where fire had never been seen. The flight attendants squealed with delight, and the
On March 1, 1979, we officially raised the flag over the American Embassy in Beijing, establishing the fulsome presence of the United States in China.
entire crew, including the pilots, came to the back of the plane to examine this previously unseen, newfangled technology.

Imagine that. This was roughly a quarter century after Polaroid had become commonplace in the United States and four years after the two Steves — Jobs and Wozniak — brought forth the first commercial Apple computer. The Chinese public had never seen a Polaroid camera, let alone heard of a computer.

Polaroid has since gone kaput. China now owns what used to be IBM’s PC business. Today, China produces 93 million microcomputers, and it has 600 million domestic cell phone subscribers. The country has become the world’s largest exporter of information technology goods.

The Chinese conduct technological espionage so brilliantly that business and government leaders in Europe and the United States are told that any conversation held anywhere in the world within range of a BlackBerry can be listened to by Chinese agents — even if you have it turned off, so long as the SIM card and battery are in place.

Think back to the opening Olympic ceremony. In 1979, a Polaroid camera stunned the most advanced Chinese military pilots. In 2008, the show put on in the Olympic “Bird’s Nest” exhibited an ability to harness technology that rivals the most sophisticated weapons or game designer or software programmer in Silicon Valley.

Which brings me to this ancient land’s willingness to adopt and adapt. When Deng Xiaoping entered the room for the initial encounter with Secretary Blumenthal, he cackled, “Where are these big American
If China used the same amount of oil per capita as parsimonious Japan, Chinese consumption would total more than 18 billion barrels a year.
capitalists we Chinese are supposed to be so afraid of?”

During our meeting, he made a remark that paralleled his famous “black cat, white cat” theme — “it doesn’t matter if the cat is white or black as long as it catches mice.” Deng’s remarks encapsulated the importance of practical results over political correctness and economic development over ideological purity — both hallmarks of modern China.

Deng made it clear to our delegation that China was intent on modernization, that the Chinese cat was focused on catching droves of economic mice as it engaged the rest of the world, starting with the trade that would be liberated from our settlement that week.

This China has done. In 1979, the United States imported a mere $595 million from China under onerous tariffs. The Chinese did not have a single dollar in official reserves.

Now, they send more than $300 billion in goods a year to the United States, and hold over $840 billion in U.S. Treasuries and agencies.

Since Deng’s ascendancy, China has grown its economy at least 10% per annum, has become the world’s pivotal factory — and is quickly moving to the cutting edge of technology.

The Chinese are survivors. During our trip to Beijing in 1979, we were treated to a soiree in the Great Hall of the People. The
The Chinese public had never seen a Polaroid camera, let alone heard of a computer. China now owns what used to be IBM’s PC business.
seventh act of the evening was a piano recital—a performance of Liszt’s “Hungarian Fantasy No. 6” — by a haggard and emaciated pianist named Liu Shikun.

Today, Liu is regarded as China’s finest pianist. He has performed worldwide, including with Seiji Ozawa and the Boston Symphony for one of the best-selling classical music albums of all time.

If you read Liu’s official Chinese biography, you will note that “he has performed in front of several generations of Chinese statesmen, including Mao Zedong … Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao.”

What it does not tell you is that he was imprisoned during the Cultural Revolution and maintained his skills by carving a keyboard on the wall of his cell and playing it day after day, hearing its music only in his imagination.

His performance for us was one of his first public appearances since his “rehabilitation,” and it was so stirring that even our Chinese hosts, many of whom had blood on their hands, were moved to tears.

I thought of Liu when I saw those eight People’s Liberation Army soldiers goose-step their way forward with the Olympic flag. They, too, are symbolic
Now, China sends more than $300 billion in goods a year to the United States and holds over $840 billion in U.S. Treasuries and agencies.
of modern China, a nation whose thousands of years of history have given us numerous repressive leaders.

China occasions an update of Winston Churchill’s famous epigram about Russia: “It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” With China, things are not always what they seem.

The Olympics have provided us with at least two examples of that. The fireworks in the video of the opening ceremonies contained computer-generated images to make the display more vivid. A cute-as-a-button nine-year-old girl lip-synched the national anthem being sung by a seven-year-old reportedly deemed not attractive enough by a member of the Politburo.

These enigmatic efforts to control and to bend reality to conform to image were evident during my 1979 visit to China. The front page of the March 1 edition of the People’s Daily prominently displayed a photograph of Chairman Hua escorting our delegation into the Great Hall. A discerning viewer would have detected that the shape of our eyes had been doctored by hand into almond-shaped, Chinese-like features.

The economic advances that put millions of Chinese in cars are real, as is the technological prowess on display in global markets and at the Olympics. The determination of a pianist practicing on a makeshift keyboard is real, as is the discipline of the goose-stepping soldiers of the PLA.

But here is the message: As we contemplate modern China’s
With China, things are not always what they seem. The Olympics have provided us with at least two examples of that.
impact on our economy and culture and national security, we must work to find the China that lies behind a carefully crafted façade.

Churchill concluded his alliterative “riddle, mystery and enigma” line by saying that the key to getting our minds around a perplexing Russia was an understanding of her underlying national interests.

In contemplating China, we need to look past carefully crafted images and deepen our understanding of her national interest. Failure to do so will be perilous.

Editor's Note: This feature is adapted from a speech Richard Fisher gave to the Progress & Freedom Foundation in Aspen, Colorado on August 18, 2008.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.

vmathur, MD , New York, NY , United States
(Thursday, August 28, 2008, 10:41:08 AM ):

The country which dominated world manufacturing and the world econony over the last 2,000 years was India. In fact, it has been the world's largest economy and manufacturer for 1500 of the last 2000 years, according to the Paris-based OECD.

India's economy was three times largerthan all of Europe's at the time of Christ's birth, with an economy ranging from one-fourth to one-third of total world output up until two hundred years ago.

Following the Battle of Plassey in 1757, and a subsequent de-industrialization and transfer of know-how, Britain surpassed India, not China, to became the industrial leader.

Let us know what you think ...
 

 

 

 

You must be a registered user of our site to send us your comments. If you have already registered, please log in. If you a new user of our site, please register now. Registration is quick, easy and completely free.

   

Complete the below to send a letter to the editor about this article.

   
Name  
 
Email Address  
 
City and State  
 
Country  
 
Comments  
 

 
Please note: If we publish your comment on The Globalist, we will identify only your name, city and country. We do not publish anonymous comments. Your email address will not be published.

We regret that we cannot publish every comment we receive. Furthermore, because we review each comment before it is published, there may be a delay between the time you send your comment and its appearance on our site. The Globalist reserves the right to edit comments for style and length.

-->




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036