Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Agree on this: money

Globalist Perspective > Global Development
From Wall Street to Africa — The Money Handlers Come Out on Top
 

By Tim Carrington | Thursday, January 08, 2009
 

Investment bankers on Wall Street and government ministers in sub-Saharan Africa may seem to have little in common at first glance. But as journalist and World Bank consultant Tim Carrington explains, the similarities are there — especially when handling money is involved.


ew observers of global finance would see much similarity between government ministers in central Africa and Wall Street’s lords of finance. Perhaps I do only because of my own peculiar work history — covering Wall Street for The Wall Street Journal and later, working as a senior communications officer in the World Bank’s Africa Region.

Same game, different name

Now, with some distance from both roles, it occurs to me that Wall Street’s moguls and Africa’s gestionnaires (meaning: policymakers) have essentially the same job. Both handle the money as it moves through the system toward various investments.

Tales of excess spin around Wall Street and Africa, and they are legion. Some involve blockbuster fraud and theft — the Madoffs and Mobutus.

In Africa, the investments tend to emanate from international donors and natural resource companies, while on Wall Street, they originate with millions of institutional and private investors.

What’s similar, though, is that local culture — be it Wall Street’s or sub-Saharan Africa’s — supports and encourages lavish compensation just for the handling of investments.

In both cases, the reward system is a source of consternation, criticism, jokes and occasional expressions of outrage. But it is generally accepted as inevitable, perhaps even necessary. Without it, according to the usual line of explanation, you couldn’t attract the "necessary talent".

Broken promises

That culture of tolerance was most starkly delineated for me during a 2005 visit to N’Djamena, the beleaguered capital of war-torn Chad, which sits atop a modest oil resource.

To help develop that resource, the World Bank and others extended loans for an oil pipeline on the now-broken promise that the Chadian government would invest specified percentages of the resulting wealth in programs to benefit a miserably impoverished population.

Contradictions

My trip included a tour of the country’s capital with a gracious health minister.
What is remarkable was the absence of shame at the juxtaposition. The house, the heat, the dust, the deaths — it was all just part of another day in N’Djamena.
The tour began with a swing by the construction site of her new home — a turreted, balconied mega-house, rising out of a city that consisted mostly of dust and slums.

Next came a harrowing walk through the main hospital in the capital, where dozens of mothers sat helplessly as their feverish babies — stricken with measles — struggled for life.

It turned out that the money for a comprehensive measles vaccine program, derived from the oil revenues had gone unused — or gone missing. As a result, this community of tiny Chadians struggled for breath under the assault of a dangerous, but preventable, disease.

No shame

What was remarkable was the absence of shame at the juxtaposition. The house, the heat, the dust, the deaths — it was all just part of another day in N’Djamena.

And how different is it from Goldman Sachs (substitute another name or figure) mapping — without a flutter of embarrassment — the distribution of $16 billion in bonuses at the conclusion of a year when Wall Street excesses treated the world to a financial calamity requiring unprecedented taxpayer bailouts?

Greed and morals

Polls in Africa show that people would consider a minister a laughingstock if he or she didn’t leave public service possessing conspicuous wealth. It simply comes with the job — as it does on Wall Street.

Local culture — be it Wall Street’s or sub-Saharan Africa’s — supports and encourages lavish compensation just for the handling of investments according to the usual line of explanation, you couldn’t attract the "necessary talent.”

Tales of excess spin around Wall Street and Africa, and they are legion. Some involve blockbuster fraud and theft — the Madoffs and Mobutus — while others are more about ordinary greed and entitlement.

What makes the money dramas so saddening is that the handlers occupy center stage throughout — as they build look-at-me homes in N’Djamena or Greenwich, talk about their $200,000 wine budgets and then weather the various recriminations that pile in when the wells run dry.

Lost on the sidelines of these timeless morality plays are the uncounted losers who might have benefitted if at least some of the attention, and some of the money flows, hadn’t been so heavily directed toward the handlers, whose brilliance (or luck) placed them so strategically on the capitalist conveyor belt.

Lost priorities

In Africa, the United States and throughout the world, there are cities that need rebuilding, companies that need to modernize — and babies who shouldn’t die of measles.

The needs are straight-forward, and they are what the money is for ultimately. Or what the money was for. To figure out where yesterday’s money is today, just ask the handlers.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.

Herman J Floeck , Westmount (Quebec) , Canada
(Sunday, January 11, 2009, 10:14:49 AM ):

Ny question is a simple one: Where were you? Board of directors, internal company auditors, external auditors, CPAs. Government oversight agencies, analysts by the thousands.

Add up all the salaries and perks of this sorry bunch -- and you get an idea how much we paid to be led into this mess. All of this could have been avoided by something that does not cost as much as a cent: moral fortitude. To all the co-creators of this sorry mess, I say: Shame, Shame on you.

Let us know what you think ...
 

 

 

 

You must be a registered user of our site to send us your comments. If you have already registered, please log in. If you a new user of our site, please register now. Registration is quick, easy and completely free.

   

Complete the below to send a letter to the editor about this article.

   
Name  
 
Email Address  
 
City and State  
 
Country  
 
Comments  
 

 
Please note: If we publish your comment on The Globalist, we will identify only your name, city and country. We do not publish anonymous comments. Your email address will not be published.

We regret that we cannot publish every comment we receive. Furthermore, because we review each comment before it is published, there may be a delay between the time you send your comment and its appearance on our site. The Globalist reserves the right to edit comments for style and length.

-->




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036