Log In  |  Register Now  
 Home | Syndication Services | Media Features | Research Center | Archive | Contributors | About Us

To receive emails containing headlines and highlights from The Globalist,
sign up here.



Topic

Companies

Culture

Development

Diplomacy

Economy

Environment

Finance

Health

History

Markets

Media

Music

Politics

Religion

Security

Sports

Technology

Women

Youth


Region

Africa

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

North America


Globalist Bookshelf

Best Books of 2012

Best Books of 2011


Editorial Staff

Contributors

Jobs & Internships


Subscribers to The Globalist's premium services can log in here:

Username:

Password:

Forgot your password?



 

Why are we so eager to be anything but brown?

Globalist Perspective > Global Culture
Dateline India: What Shade of Brown Are You?
 

By Sampriti Ganguli | Thursday, June 10, 2010
 

How many shades of brown can there be? In a country of a billion brown people, it turns out the answer to that question is many. And who knew in fact that there is a hierarchy of brown — from the lighter, more desirable shades, to the darker, supposedly less desirable shades? Sampriti Ganguli explores.


myself would have never figured out the many shades of brown were it not for my colossal failure (at the tender age of 23) to procure a prospective husband in the Indian marriage market.

Born to Indian parents (who had a “love marriage”) and raised abroad for most of my life should have been enough to earn an exemption from an arranged marriage.

As a child, I remember my grandmother rubbing malai on my face, muttering to herself that only home remedies could help lighten my skin.

But, truth be told, after a few failed relationships on my own, I thought to myself, “What more do I have left to lose?” And so I took the plunge and allowed my aunts to begin the process of “shopping” for a suitable groom.

Although now happily married, I ultimately failed in my assigned mission to find a husband in India. It took me a while to understand that a vital part of my failure in India itself was due to the fact that I didn’t take the appropriate care to define the right shade of brown for myself.

I know now that “honey” is really a much better way to describe one’s complexion and skin tone — and therefore, increase the pool of available suitors. It is definitely preferable to “wheat” or “coffee” — which denote a slightly darker shade of brown.

And if, as a prospective bride, you want to keep your potential future groom guessing, describe yourself as “café au lait” (the pool of French-speaking Indians is, after all, somewhat limited).

But whatever you do, heaven forbid that you should ever use the word “tan.” True, to the untrained eye, this shade of brown might actually suggest that the bride-to-be relishes being in the sun.

Alas, in India, it connotes nothing but shame. How ironic that Northern Europeans, by contrast, long for that sunshine and delight in being tanned, while we South Asian women, surrounded by the sun’s rays for most of the year, yearn to stay out of the sun.

As I got older, the home remedies were replaced by India’s best-selling cosmetic product, “Fair and Lovely” skin whitening cream.

If I had to do it over again, perhaps I would have used the terms “auburn” or “bronze” which denote something more glorious (and remind me of a walk down the hair-dye aisle of CVS — the drugstore chain here in the United States).

Why, in a country where everyone is, after all, various pigments of brown, are we so eager to be anything but?

As a child, I remember my grandmother rubbing malai — the cream that forms on top of milk — on my face, muttering to herself that only home remedies could help lighten my skin and then maybe I would find a suitable husband.

As I got older, the home remedies were replaced by India’s best-selling cosmetic product, “Fair and Lovely” skin whitening cream, guaranteed to whiten your skin in 90 days.

It begged the broader question — could you be “lovely” without being “fair”? What color of brown was the closest to “fair”? And, was it “fair” that, in fact, brown couldn’t be a color unto itself, but had to be marketed as something else?

As I tried to describe the closest shade of brown to my own skin, while I was in India during my 24th birthday and actively hunting for my future mate, I remembered getting ready for a college trip to Spain four years earlier.

There, a friend told me, “They’ll call you morena (brown). It’s a real compliment — and they’ll love your skin.” I remember at the time thinking that being brown was wonderful. And when I went to Spain, I blushed each time I heard the term morena.

Was it “fair” that, in fact, brown couldn’t be a color unto itself, but had to be marketed as something else?

Meanwhile back in India, during my spousal search, I decided to put down “chocolate” when the matrimonial section in the newspaper asked me to fill in the blank for skin complexion.

If only I had known then that “chocolate” was a code word for the darkest (and therefore least desirable) shade of brown — and hence the descriptor least likely to bring me my winsome groom.

If only someone had told me early on what shade of brown I should be, I would never have had to think about it as hard.




Join the discussion of this article on our Facebook page.

Follow The Globalist on Twitter.




Copyright © 2000-2013 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos.

1100 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036