The Washington Redskins and U.S. Foreign Policy by Nathan Richter

The Washington Redskins and U.S. foreign policy — more similarities than differences?

Globalist Perspective > Global Leaders The Washington Redskins and U.S. Foreign Policy
By Nathan Richter \| Monday, November 27, 2006

From Iraq to North Korea and Iran, George W. Bush and his team of foreign policy advisors have been on a losing streak lately. Yet, the Bush team is not the only one in Washington that has been letting down its fans. The U.S. capital’s professional football team, too, entered the season with high expectations — but has been unable to live up to the hype, argues Nathan Richter.

fter the Washington Redskins’ trip to the playoffs in 2005 — and with several highly paid off-season acquisitions

What may be most worrisome is that, at this juncture, both the fate of the Redskins and that of U.S. foreign policy – in the eyes of their respective leaders — come down to a prayer.

— the team’s fans were abuzz with thoughts of Super Bowl glory for the 2006/07 season. Yet after ten games, the Redskins had won just three.

With such a poor record, there is next to no chance that the team will even advance to the playoffs — much less win the championship.

The Redskins are the most highly valued team in North America, with a worth estimated by Forbes magazine at over $1.4 billion. Despite their losing record on the field, off the field the Redskins are highly profitable, bringing in about $300 million in revenues each year.

Money to spend

Given their financial prowess, the Redskins dominate the off-season acquisition period almost every year. They can afford to pay handsomely for stars in the hopes of bringing a Super Bowl title back to the nation’s capital.

And just as the Redskins are spending any sum necessary to realize their dreams of football greatness, the Bush Administration has been putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to its vision for Iraq. In fact, the total cost of the war to date is more than $334 billion — or about $100,000 per minute.

Failing in Iraq

In the eyes of many Americans, the Iraq war is a failure. Yet, the Bush Administration is spending huge amounts of money in an effort to stabilize and secure that country. And the more it spends, the more the war is becoming an even larger disappointment

The total cost of the Iraq war to date is more than $334 billion — or about $100,000 per minute.

Similarly, the Redskins spend millions on pricey players — and yet continue to lose. In the last four years, the Redskins have managed just one winning season. Every year it’s the same story: More money comes out of owner Daniel Snyder’s pockets — and goes into the pockets of players.

Expectations are always high in the Redskins front office, yet it is becoming a recurring theme — spend money, lose games. Both organizations seem unwilling — or unable — to learn from their mistakes. As a result, their goals have sunk straight into the ground.

Losing team

Along with its penchant for spending, the Bush team shares with the Redskins a tendency to vest trust in veterans who may be well past their prime. Redskins coach Joe Gibbs re-joined the team in 2004, after a 12-year break that began in early 1993 — around the time the first President Bush (George H.W. or Bush 41) left office.

Back then, Gibbs was a big success, leading the Redskins to three Super Bowl titles during his last tenure as head coach — and fans expected victory with Gibbs’ return. On his return to the Redskins, Gibbs hired assistant head coach Al Saunders, who now has a 700-page playbook and a new offense in tow. Saunders is not the only old coach on staff. A number of Gibbs’ current staff are veterans from the glory years of the 1990s.

Changing players

Similarly, back in 2002, when

Like the Redskins, the Bush Administration is spending lots of money to stabilize and secure Iraq — and the more it spends, the more it is becoming a disappointment.
President George W. Bush formed his team, he looked to Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld — veterans of the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush I administrations.

The one manned the Vice President’s office, while the other’s task was to whip the Pentagon back into shape after the supposedly overly lax Clinton years.

Experience may be a key factor in choosing leaders, but sometimes you have to know when enough is enough. Just as a new/old playbook has not worked for the Redskins, Rumsfeld’s plans have not translated from paper to the battlefield either.

Relying on faith

Gibbs and President Bush are also united in their reluctance to make personnel changes. It was only after Democrats took control of both the Senate and House in the November 2006 midterm elections that Bush removed Rumsfeld.

For Gibbs, it took a 27-3 thumping by the Philadelphia Eagles to send Redskins quarterback Mark Brunell to the bench — even though the move had been eagerly anticipated in Washington for a while.

Down to a prayer

Finally, both President Bush and Mr. Gibbs are deeply religious men who rely on prayer and faith. Indeed, President Bush relied heavily upon his Methodist values and image in the elections in 2000 and 2004,

Redskins Coach Joe Gibbs and President Bush are united in their reluctance to make personnel changes.
while Joe Gibbs has made it no secret that he is a fundamentalist Christian who sees a role for prayer when it comes to coaching the Redskins.

Yet, with leaders who trust completely in the power of prayer rather than learning from the past, the Redskins and the Bush team have both gotten themselves into big trouble.

What may be most worrisome is that, at this juncture, both the fate of the Redskins and that of U.S. foreign policy — in the eyes of their respective leaders, and intriguingly, the world-at-large — come down to a prayer.

	Printer-friendly version
	Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Let us know what you think ...

You must be a registered user of our site to send us your comments. If you have already registered, please log in. If you a new user of our site, please register now. Registration is quick, easy and completely free.

Complete the below to send a letter to the editor about this article.

Name

Email Address

City and State

Country

Comments

Please note: If we publish your comment on The Globalist, we will identify only your name, city and country. We do not publish anonymous comments. Your email address will not be published.

We regret that we cannot publish every comment we receive. Furthermore, because we review each comment before it is published, there may be a delay between the time you send your comment and its appearance on our site. The Globalist reserves the right to edit comments for style and length.


	Copyright © 2000-2010 by The Globalist. Reproduction of content on this site without The Globalist's written permission is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy The Globalist claims full trademark rights to The Globalist name and logos. McPherson Square, 927 15th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005