The Creeping Saudi Arabization of America
The U.S. Supreme Court chips away at the separation between church and state.
- Does the Supreme Court aim to bring more Middle Eastern spirit to America?
- The fundamentalists on the Supreme Court undermine the fundamental principles of America’s founding.
- The latest move by the US’s highest court is akin to a creeping Saudi Arabization of America.
- Given Europe’s bloody example, the US wisely made the practice of religion a private matter.
- The legal “logic” is always the same with the Supreme Court: define the political outcome you want to see.
- The old US safeguards of the freedom and privacy of religion are being thrown overboard.
- Prior to the Roberts Supreme Court, the US used to be among the leading forces of modernity.
You have to leave it to the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court: As all the world knows, the U.S. adventure to bring democracy to the Middle East is failing rather miserably. Undeterred by this failure, the Supreme Court is doing its level best to bring more Middle Eastern sectarian spirit to America.
Case in point: The 5:4 ruling, rendered in early May 2014, that it is fine for a town council government in New York State to begin its sessions with a Christian prayer.
If any part of the U.S. constitution is known virtually worldwide, it is probably the principle of separation of church and state and the lack of a state religion. Nevertheless, according to the court’s majority, prohibiting such a prayer in a government context (in line with precedents going back to 1947) is “beyond the authority of government.”
The legal “logic” is always the same with this court: First, they define the political outcome they want to see. Then they come up with a freewheeling legal doctrine that fits their political tastes.
In a different case – one where the justices would want to prohibit a practice they don’t like – they would flip their current “reasoning” on its ahead. Then, the decision would argue that a specific practice must be “under the authority of government.”
Against the core founding principles
Whatever the Supreme Court justices’ semi-artful way of reinventing American law, they are going against the core principles promoted by many early leaders of the United States — and the colonies before them.
Indeed, before the United States started its journey among nations, refugees in pursuit of religious freedom were among the early settlers of this country. Many had fled state religions that did not allow them to practice freely.
While some groups were less than tolerant toward other sects in individual U.S. states, when it came to writing the nation’s constitution, the framers maintained this spirit of tolerance as a core principle.
To keep the federal government unsullied by considerations of religion, they embraced the separation of church and state. They had good reason to do so. Europe’s history at the time was pock marked by long wars of religion between neighboring principalities and states of different faiths – and the believers in the U.S. states were similarly varied. Wars of religion could easily have erupted between the new American states too.
Given Europe’s rather bloody example, it was deemed advisable to make the practice of religion a private matter. Eventually, this national principle was applied to the states and local governments via the post-Civil War 14th Amendment and Supreme Court rulings. Now, these old safeguards are being thrown overboard.
Given the proud starting point of the United States, one can only deem the latest move by the country’s highest court as akin to a creeping Saudi Arabization of America.
To be sure, Saudi Arabia is among the most intolerant countries in the world when it comes to religion. The United States is obviously far removed from the Wahhabis’ arrogance, cynicism and grave intolerance toward other religions.
Destruction by fundamentalism
The band of fundamentalists serving on the court these days has but one goal – to go up against the fundamental principles of America’s founding and destroying them brick by brick, on one issue after another.
Sophists that some of these justices are, they will always find some shady principle or phraseology on which to pin their latest attempt to move the United States out of the 21st century and back toward the late 18th century, if not further back than that.
Editor’s note: This essay was originally published on May 7, 2014, and was updated by the author on June 28, 2014.