Global Pairings, Richter Scale

The Transatlantic World is Falling Apart

The U.S. is issuing frantic wake-up calls on defense – but Europe isn’t listening.

Takeaways


  • The Europeans are not fixated on funding their armies -- but their pensions.
  • Americans see the Europe of 2014 as ill prepared militarily as the United States was in 1914 (or 1939).
  • The U.S. is issuing frantic wake-up calls on defense – but Europe isn’t listening.
  • Tellingly, the Americans are keen to turn the looming calamity into a sales opportunity.
  • The Boeings, Lockheed Martins and other U.S. defense firms are eagerly supporting America’s Cassandras.

The transatlantic world is falling apart. Elites on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean see the world of today in very different terms.

The gap over Edward Snowden and the NSA could not be any larger. Now, the situation in Ukraine is causing Americans to issue a constant stream of Cassandra-like calls, but the Europeans aren’t listening.

The Americans tell everyone in Europe that the entire continent — not just Ukraine, the Baltics or Poland — will eventually be steamrolled by a newly assertive Russia. They beg the Europeans to recognize the seriousness of the situation and not be woefully unprepared for what lies ahead.

As a matter of fact, these voices see the Europe of 2014 as happy-go-lucky and ill prepared militarily as the United States was in 1914 (or 1939).

It is most telling to hear what conclusion those American Cassandras arrive at. The only way out, they argue, is for Europeans to finally recognize the earnestness of the situation – and collectively push defense spending to at least 2% of GDP.

In other words, the point is to turn the looming calamity into a sales opportunity. No wonder the Boeings, Lockheed Martins and other U.S. defense firms are eagerly supporting any American “strategist” or think tank who is keen to trumpet this message.

The Europeans, for their part, aren’t buying. They are under no illusion about what a crook Putin is. But they seriously doubt that the Russians are going to pursue an offensive strategy beyond their own immediate neighbors.

To the Americans’ great chagrin, the Europeans are not fixated on funding their armies — but their pensions.

Get The Globalist’s latest headlines in your email inbox three times a week. Sign up here.

Facing such unresponsiveness, American strategists are trying desperately to up the ante. What will Europe do, they ask, if the North Koreans undertake a nuclear strike on South Korea, the Chinese move on the Senkaku islands and Saudi Arabia engages in a war with Iran? Will it wake up then?

To which the Europeans’ response is the one feature they have by now readily adopted from Britain – the mindset to “keep calm and carry on” even when faced with a real crisis.

Such European equanimity drives the Americans bonkers. Reveling alternatively in a mindset where the United States is the world’s “only superpower” and one driven by fears and phobias, Americans now worry about the fact that 1991 could have sent a wrong signal.

Close to a quarter century ago, the Soviet Union disappeared from the global stage with barely a whimper. At the time, the effective self-dissolution of the erstwhile archenemy (almost) came as more of a shock to the United States than in Moscow itself.

For generations, Americans had been conditioned to believe that the Soviet Union, if ever, would go out with a big bang – a truly catastrophic event. If the Americans were sure of one thing, then it was that the Communists would not go quietly.

Since that scenario did not materialize at the time, the supposition now is the reverse. Russia – which didn’t produce a big bang then – is deadly determined to surprise the world by producing a big calamity now.

To which the Europeans respond that the Russian empire has feet of clay – and brittle ones at that.

It is hard to recall a time when Europe and the United States have been further apart. At times, it seems they are barely part of the same civilization any longer.

Tags: , , , ,

About Stephan Richter

Stephan Richter is the publisher and editor-in-chief of The Globalist.

  • Larry Hajek

    you could have written the same thing in 1976, what changed it? Does Malaise ring any bells??

  • originalone

    Considering that all the Think Tanks, Pundits, Warmongers in the U.S. depend on having a “Boogieman” to justify the enormous sums of $$$ given them from their deep pocket backers, what else are they going to say?

  • H. H. GAFFNEY

    Oh yes, we keep coming back to “pensions” — the stupid Europeans sustaining their social safety nets rather than girding for the New Cold War. Let us not forget that, other than Bismarck creating such social safety nets in the first place, the U.S. encouraged them to take care of their people when it became apparent that the Communist parties (at least in Italy and France) threatened democracy — economics and the Marshall Plan came before NATO in order to beat Communism. By the way, does anyone know what “2 percent” would buy? And if it were reached, would it not the next day rise to 3 percent, and so on? In any case, the grand mission of the United States is now to eliminate all the American social safety nets — or so the superior party wants — and by extension everybody else’s social safety nets. Got to build massive military forces so that we can all march off to the Korean nuclear war!