Forty Years of Delusions
How has the 40th anniversary of the Six Days War shone a spotlight on today’s crisis of leadership in the Middle East?
June 6, 2007
Israel is now being led by a government paralyzed by self-inflicted wounds, including a multitude of corruption scandals. The country’s government lost its compass in the wake of the war with Hezbollah, along with the courage to risk seizing the initiative and taking real steps toward peace.
Meanwhile, the Palestinians continue to pay dearly for their delusional and inept leaders, who have missed every opportunity to give their people any hope for the future.
It is true that some important and positive developments have occurred since 1967: Israel signed peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan in 1979 and in 1995, respectively.
The Arab League adopted a resolution in March 2002 and reintroduced it in March 2007, offering Israel a comprehensive and normal peace in exchange for the territories captured in 1967.
The initiative is in stark contrast to the resolution the League adopted more than 30 years ago in Khartoum, which is known for its three No’s: no recognition, no negotiation, and no peace.
Today, however, a majority of Israelis and Palestinians accept the principle of a two-state solution. Despite these moves forward, the ongoing violent conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and the existence of a state of war between Israel and Syria have substantially hurt Arab-Israeli relations.
The continuing occupation has strengthened Islamic radicalism throughout the Middle East, and the Iraq war has vastly increased anti-Israeli and anti-American sentiments all across the Arab world.
Given the disarray and bloody infighting among Palestinians, and Israel’s internal political frenzy coupled with the absence of any national consensus about the nature of peace, the political and security environments are rapidly deteriorating to new dangerous levels.
The extremists on both sides, although they are in the minority and pursue different means, are gaining in strength. Taking advantage of the present situation, they have usurped the political agenda. And through their actions and single-mindedness, they are pushing the majority toward the precipice.
Forty years after the Six Days War, it seems, now more than ever, that the sanest questions to ask are: What are Israelis and Arabs, especially the Palestinians, waiting for? How, and by what measures, can any party improve its position, given more time?
Forty years of occupation have given Israel no added security and no recipe for a lasting peace. Forty years of blind resistance has consumed the Palestinian community from within and is destroying the last vestiges of a civil society.
A comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace is still possible, but how much more destruction must both sides endure before they recognize this bittersweet truth?
Although Palestinian factionalism and violent internal rivalries are to a large degree preventing Israel from undertaking open-ended negotiations with the Palestinians, the Israeli leadership must somehow rouse itself from its “deep sleep” and find the resolve to develop a coherent strategy to deal with the Palestinian conflict.
At the same time, Israel needs to move more forcefully on the Syrian front and seriously explore the possibility for peace. Israel must not reject Syria’s call for peace negotiations without testing Damascus’ real intentions.
Not doing so would be nothing less than a continuation of the failed policies that led to the summer 2006 war. It is obvious that hewing to these policies will only result in future wars that will exact a far greater toll.
The key issue is not that Syria can instigate wars at will without serious risks to itself. It is that the growing forces of Islamic radicalism, terrorists and Jihadi movements will create conditions beyond anyone’s power to control, including Syria’s. Because the stakes are so high, Syria must demonstrate that its call for peace is genuine.
An Israeli breakthrough with Syria will isolate extremist Palestinians such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad — and strengthen the moderate camp. As Israel negotiates with Syria, it must do everything in its power to encourage Palestinian moderates by taking some unilateral actions on the ground to ease the lives of ordinary Palestinians.
Measures that Israel can enact without major risk to its national security concerns may include the much spoken about release of prisoners — as well as allowing for the freer movement of people and goods.
In addition, Israel should reward non-violent communities with economic incentives, signal an end to settlement expansion — and channel tens of millions of Palestinian tax dollars to moderate Palestinians.
Most importantly, the Israelis should not wait for the Palestinians to get their act together. Israel must abandon its tit-for-tat policy and pursue a strategy that will eventually lead to ending the conflict.
Meanwhile, the Arab states, having just reintroduced the initiative for a comprehensive peace, have to remain relentless in pursuing a peace agenda. They must demonstrate the capacity and the political will to deal with extremist elements that undermine the Arab collective will.
John F. Kennedy once observed, “Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other.” The last 40 years have been long enough and painful enough to suggest that 40 years from now, the requirements for peace will not significantly change.
But the price of peace, as shown in the effect of delay on human lives and resources, will be monumentally higher. Will the current Arab and Israeli leaders gather up their courage and take heed or by their inaction usher in another 40 years of deadly delusions?
Canada’s Response to the China Challenge
June 5, 2007